CRDO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 21.75% compared to Credo Technology Group Holding's net margin of 6.29%. Credo Technology Group Holding's return on equity of 0.91% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 2.9%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a consensus price target of $80.42, signalling upside risk potential of 69.19%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $148.34 which suggests that it could grow by 47.17%. Given that Credo Technology Group Holding has higher upside potential than Advanced Micro Devices, analysts believe Credo Technology Group Holding is more attractive than Advanced Micro Devices.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.739, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.869%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Credo Technology Group Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Credo Technology Group Holding quarterly revenues are $135M, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Credo Technology Group Holding's net income of $29.4M is lower than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $482M. Notably, Credo Technology Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 4,753.00x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 101.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credo Technology Group Holding is 24.61x versus 6.40x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Broadcom has a net margin of 21.75% compared to Credo Technology Group Holding's net margin of 36.89%. Credo Technology Group Holding's return on equity of 0.91% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 14.67%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a consensus price target of $80.42, signalling upside risk potential of 69.19%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $250.17 which suggests that it could grow by 28.8%. Given that Credo Technology Group Holding has higher upside potential than Broadcom, analysts believe Credo Technology Group Holding is more attractive than Broadcom.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.69399999999999%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadcom offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Credo Technology Group Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend.

Credo Technology Group Holding quarterly revenues are $135M, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $14.9B. Credo Technology Group Holding's net income of $29.4M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $5.5B. Notably, Credo Technology Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 4,753.00x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 93.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credo Technology Group Holding is 24.61x versus 17.03x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 21.75% compared to Credo Technology Group Holding's net margin of 11.02%. Credo Technology Group Holding's return on equity of 0.91% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a consensus price target of $80.42, signalling upside risk potential of 69.19%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $113.96 which suggests that it could grow by 63.14%. Given that Credo Technology Group Holding has higher upside potential than Marvell Technology, analysts believe Credo Technology Group Holding is more attractive than Marvell Technology.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.435%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Credo Technology Group Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend.

Credo Technology Group Holding quarterly revenues are $135M, which are smaller than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Credo Technology Group Holding's net income of $29.4M is lower than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Credo Technology Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 4,753.00x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credo Technology Group Holding is 24.61x versus 10.48x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 21.75% compared to Credo Technology Group Holding's net margin of 56.17%. Credo Technology Group Holding's return on equity of 0.91% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a consensus price target of $80.42, signalling upside risk potential of 69.19%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.36 which suggests that it could grow by 48.92%. Given that Credo Technology Group Holding has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Credo Technology Group Holding is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.581, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.058%.

Credo Technology Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Credo Technology Group Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Credo Technology Group Holding quarterly revenues are $135M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Credo Technology Group Holding's net income of $29.4M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Credo Technology Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 4,753.00x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 39.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credo Technology Group Holding is 24.61x versus 22.00x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.